Talk:Challenger Deep
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Challenger Deep article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A news item involving Challenger Deep was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 3 June 2009. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 23, 2012. |
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
What is a sample?
[edit]No link to what they are or how they’re made. 2600:1700:6756:4830:9DFB:D817:1B88:C1CD (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- The samples taken were depth soundings. All the information was there in the paragraph about the 1875 Challenger expedition, but it was presented in a slightly confusing order. I have tweaked this to make things a bit more clear. Does that help? Pyrope 02:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Explaining bomb/explosive soundings
[edit]There are a lot of mentions here of bomb soundings or explosive soundings, which are not explained in the article. I would like to link these to another appropriate article, but I don't know what the right target would be. The articles on echo sounding, depth sounding, and multibeam echosounder don't seem to cover this. One thing I found was Sofar bomb but it doesn't seem like the right topic. Can anyone help to find the right article, or do we have a gap here? Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
How deep?
[edit]I've started a discussion at Talk:Mariana Trench about the inconsistency between the values used in the two articles. Mikenorton (talk) 12:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
What is it?
[edit]The article needs a section at the start saying what it is and how it formed. I find it most odd that there isn't a section about the geological processes that formed it. Just endless willy-waggling accounts of the various expeditions. 86.189.141.23 (talk) 19:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
C-class to B-class
[edit]This article has been extremely well referenced for a C-class article, and although it meets several other standards of a B-class article (Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria), I wonder if it could benefit from an info box or two, and some broadening of language for a less technically savvy audience. I think with those two issues addressed, it could be reclassified. What do others think? LesserGoldfinch (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Geography
- C-Class vital articles in Geography
- C-Class Micronesia articles
- Low-importance Micronesia articles
- WikiProject Micronesia articles
- C-Class Geology articles
- Mid-importance Geology articles
- Mid-importance C-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- C-Class geography articles
- Top-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- C-Class Oceans articles
- Low-importance Oceans articles
- WikiProject Oceans articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Selected anniversaries (January 2012)