Talk:Religion

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Religion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12: 30 days

Religion is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 15, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
November 19, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Former featured article candidate

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Folklore Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Andrew Stephens (9 April 2006). "God of all things". The Age.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Jainism#Core beliefs|Triple Jems of Jainism]] The anchor (#Core beliefs) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Religion

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I suggest that you revise your definition of religion. Your current Religion article reads: “Religion is a range of social-cultural systems [...]”. No doubt, religion reflects different social-cultural systems but is not a social-cultural phenomenon.

As an uncountable noun (i.e. in “lato sensu”) the word religion represents our endeavour as human beings to reach what is behind the world of nature of which we are part and therefore share its natural limitations including our incapacity to mentally fully comprehend what is behind it – its creation and maintenance.

As a countable noun (i.e. in “stricto sensu”) the word religion stands for different religions, each one in its own way trying to reach what is behind the world of nature. It is here that different social-cultural systems are present, each one corresponding to the particular social-cultural environment in which that particular religion developed.

Science brings us more and more advanced knowledge about the world of nature. However it is also a human activity and as such exists equally within the boundaries of the world of nature and therefore is unable to reach what is behind it.

With best regards,

Lurerelu Lurerelu (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's all very interesting, but Wikipedia is WP:NOT a publisher of original thought. PepperBeast (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Team,

Thank you very much for acknowledging promptly (10/03/2023) my initial communication (09/03/2023) and inviting me to further communication, but your message is a bit strange: It says “Reply to Lurerelu”, that is, you are inviting me, Lurerelu, to reply to Lurerelu! However, I am most grateful for the opportunity to continue involved.

Referring back to my message of 09/03/2023, my intention was to provide your readers with an unbiased and comprehensive definition of “religion”. I can only hope that my goal has been achieved.

All the Best to Everyone,

Lurerelu 109.147.85.177 (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 196.190.60.140 (talk) 14:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the use of the word "myth"

The second paragraph of the article states the following:

"Religions may contain symbolic tales that may attempt to explain the origin of life, the universe, and other phenomena; some followers believe these to be true stories; others regard them as myth."

I'm concerned that the use of the word "myth" for this purpose may be confusing. While most readers will correctly assess that this statement merely contrasts those who literally believe in the tales and those who do not, using the word "myth" to describe a belief in the falsehood of these stories contradicts the definition given in the myth article itself (in theological contexts), which states that:

"Myth is a genre of folklore or theology consisting primarily of narratives that play a fundamental role in a society, such as foundational tales or origin myths. For folklorists, historians, philosophers or theologians this is very different from the use of "myth" which simply meaning something that is not true. Instead, the truth value of a myth is not a defining criterion."

While I'm not certain of the best way to reword this, I would appreciate further discussion on whether it is proper to use the word "myth" in this context. Mothyy (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; it's precisely how the word "myth" shouldn't be used. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The concept of "religion" was formed in the 16th and 17th centuries.[3][4] Sacred texts like the Bible, the Quran, and others did not have a word or even a concept of religion in the original languages and neither did the people or the cultures in which these sacred texts were written.[5][6]

The above is incorrect as religion concept was from the beginning. Men walked with God. Just because the texts weren't found or written doesn't mean the word wasn't handed down from generation to generation . Abrahamic religions are the belief of God the father. God of Abraham. We are descendants of Adam who was made from God. It's not a debate it's a fact. Mct0321 (talk) 01:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the things you are saying are more appropriate for the regular social media. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

So I discovered a religion that wasn't on here and I would like to put it on here so that people can learn more about that religion because I think that the religion is very interesting and shares a good message The Prophetess of Ommeism (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Remsense诉 16:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Society, Ethics, and Technology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 22 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Singhsimranjit071294 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Charshenk (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islamis status

How to viral islamic 106.205.186.18 (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]