User talk:Talshiarr
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for telling us about the Salt Lake Stingers. I saw your name on Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Utah, so I added you to the main list on Wikipedia:Wikipedians. Let me know (or remove it yourself) if you don't want that for some reason. — Toby 18:59 Nov 28, 2002 (UTC)
User categorization
[edit]Greetings! Your user page hasn't been vandalized :-) --it was updated to use the new User Categorization scheme. I have categorized your User Page as a Wikipedian in Utah (Category:Wikipedians in Utah) since your name was listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Utah page. The Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Utah page is scheduled for deletion. Thanks! Roby Wayne Talk • Hist 00:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Commons
[edit]Hey! It might be a little late now, but I noticed you uploaded a couple of pretty good pictures to en.wikipedia.org. Have you alredy heard of commons? Its the media repository for all wikipedias in all languages. Pictures you upload there are automatically usable by many mor wikimedia projects. That makes them a lot more useful than if they are uploaded directly to en.wikipedia.org. Maybe for your next pictures :-) --Dschwen 18:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Dschwen, I'll check it out. There are some forthcoming that might merit inclusion there that have more general interest than just one town :). Talshiarr 19:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- You should upload just about everything there really. Here images are often deleted if they are not used, and to be used they basically have to be suitable for Commons. So uploading here should really be the exception, not the rule (and exceptions should usually be fair use images). Richard001 (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 |
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, Image:Wilson's Snipe on a fencepost, central Utah.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 09:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Talshiarr,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Wilson's Snipe on a fencepost, central Utah.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 26, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-09-26. Note that I changed the description to a Wilson's Snipe since Common Snipe aren't found in the U.S. apparently. howcheng {chat} 23:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks very much! I'm honored that it made the cut to considered a PotD. I made a few changes to the caption and if any others are felt worthy I would encourage someone to add them. Talshiarr 23:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
All I asked Was that source your commets before comming in. It's wasn;t a matter of not beileving you, or liking you. Or liking what you said. I am unsure what you mean by a silly Ariostle qoute. I think that qoute should apply to everything on wiki. I personally as you said beileve that this website is nothing more than joke and I just like to have fun with. Please do not slander anyone without first sourincg your assetions. _ coalhouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coalhouse (talk • contribs) 17:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine, but in future if you wish to dispute something you see on a discussion page that is unsourced, the solution would not be to just delete it but rather ask whoever wrote it to source it if you feel it warrants it. I would never have placed any such comment on the actual article page without a source. Also, it is not "slandering" someone to point out something they actually did. I would be curious to know why you feel this site is a joke. Your professors may take points off as you assert, but I would think it is rather lazy of anyone to simply leech info from Wikipedia for a paper, anyway. It's a good starting point for library research, not the ending point. Talshiarr 18:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Now that you soucred it. I can accpet that it happened. You probaly right I should brought on discussion rather than just delteing it. I think the reason I think wiki is Joke is obiouvs. I mean you say it correctly it's a good starting point for research, but it's hard to to put faith in a website that more pages devoted to Mortal Kombat characters than people who actually matter. And it way to easy to intenolly add misinformation and never get caught. (I:E Creating Havoc) and if i can do it, then who esle can? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coalhouse (talk • contribs) 20:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC) I guess that the biggest rearson I beileve this site to be a joke is the words of Marcus Aurellis "The opion of ten thousand men if worth nothing if not one of them know what thier talking about" --Coalhouse 20:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)--Coalhouse 20:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)--Coalhouse 20:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Heh, believe it or not but I have complained about the jibberish pop culture articles taking up the space on the "Featured Article" section, but there is some good information on here that is difficult to find without running off to a large set of encyclopedias (or paying for the online ones). I tend to think of the place as more of a giant Trivial Pursuit game. While it's easy to post nonsense, it's just as easy to revert back or correct. You'd be surprised how fast junk is spotted and removed, but I wish the requirements to post at all were more strict. The posts full of nonsense tend to be the ones the fewest people would care about.Talshiarr 05:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Utah Wikipedia Meetup
[edit]| Interested in attending a Utah Wikipedia Meetup? |
|---|
|
If you are interested in a Utah meetup, please visit Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Utah and voice your interest. |
--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWB
NowCommons: File:El paso downtown main.jpg
[edit]File:El paso downtown main.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:El paso downtown main.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:El paso downtown main.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Great Photo!
[edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| This is a well-done shot: File:MountPleasant-MainStreet2.jpg, I'm a little jealous... Bill Whittaker (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC) (UTC) |
Possibly unfree File:Paisano pete statue.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paisano pete statue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]{{Ivmbox|Hello, Talshiarr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Talshiarr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)